History

East vs Rest.

A basic comparison between East Asians and Whites. The first step to redpill the East Asians brainwashed by the media and western propaganda.

1) IQ by Country

iq map detalhado atualizado

2) Overall comparison: Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid:

comparacao triracial2 iq modificado

The IQ in this chart was adjusted because in the original Blacks are with 85 IQ and Whites 100, because only African-Americans(who are mixed) and Whites with Germanic origin were measured.

 

3) At individual level: The 3 most intelligent people in the world are East Asians.

top 3 most intelligent man in the world

 

4) Historically:

There is no effective and reliable way of measuring which civilization was most advanced, but there is a common census among people who really understand history, including Hitler:

The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler

In addition to recognizing that East Asians are historically superior, Hitler also admitted that the origin of the myth of “white supremacy” is the inferiority complex.

Also, people who understand world history know that these regions are historically the most important:

center of civilization3

Note: White liars love to say that they created civilization, more specifically the Nordic sub-race, which is a ridiculous lie that can be refuted with a fucking Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization

In fact, these barbarians lived primitive until the 11th century. They suffered racism and were enslaved throughout history by the Mediterranean as Romans.

18835614_1405735202851960_2784295483125693461_n

That is why they need to lie so much, to the point of creating hilarious fantasies like “hyperborean civilization”

Others indicatives:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_regions_by_past_GDP_(PPP) (The West only surpassed China in the 19th century)

Recommended reading:

5) Present – Innovation

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_patents

6) Future – Projection:

economic center

“The problem with imperialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(PPP)#Long_term_GDP_estimates

Conclusion: East Asians scientifically proven more intelligent and civilized in general. The East(China) has at least 4,000 years of history being the most advanced civilization in the world, the western golden age has only 2 centuries, and will be overcome again soon.

The “white supremacy” as well as the inferiority complex of many East Asians has no basis in this world.

 

 

Bonus:

That’s how the West got rich:

imperialism

Anyone who thinks the West has some kind of merit must think that thieves, killers and swindlers are the best people in society.

 

Races, Cultures and Geography

Last update: 05/28/2017

This article was not intended to offend anyone, just refute myths spread by the West.

 

Summary:

  •  “Asia” and “Europe” are completely meaningless concepts and the term “Asian” is, among other things, racist.
  • There are only 6 or 7 races, 6 continents and currently only 3 cultural spheres.
  • The concept of “Europe” was invented to the North “Europeans” steal part of the Mediterranean culture.
  • The result of this brainwashing is that many people in the world do not know whether they are white, brown or yellow. Western or Eastern. European or Asian etc.
  • There is no direct connection either to race or culture between East Asians(neo-Mongoloid) and Austronesians, Southeast Eurasians are closer to Indians.
  • “Middle Easterns” who are called “Asians” in some western countries are in fact whites and westerners.
  •  The cradle of the whole West is the region that they call “Asia” or “Middle East”, the Eastern Mediterranean.
  •  The current dominant race of “Europe” is a historically primitive people, without its own history, culture or civilization. The educated white racists know this, that is why they distort history, to steal the Mediterranean culture and to hide that other people are historically superior.

 

Some “supremacists” know that reality is against them. Even Hitler admitted that supremacist propaganda was only to reverse the inferiority complex that the Germans had. But unlike the Nazis(who were not whites supremacists but Nordicists), what white “supremacists” did was to distort the story so that it fits into the “whites supremacist”.

This article was made to clarify basic things about our world, about race, culture and continent. Starting with race:

RACE

There are only 6 or 7 races, other would be the Capoid race(AKA: Khoisan), but there are controversies about this. And as you can see, there is no such thing as “Asian race”, Filipinos are so “Asians” as natives of Madagascar. Berbers, Arabs, Iranians(Aryans) and Levantines are in fact White because they are Caucasoid and White mean Caucasoid, there is no scientist who disagrees with this, absolutely none.

This map was based on the classification of Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, with the addition of the Australoid race that is different from Black Africans:

mapa racial atual4.jpg

The color terminology is just a representation. There are no people who are truly white or yellow, except those who have some kind of disease such as albinism or hepatitis.

CULTURE

About macroculture, basically there are only 3 pillars, which give rise to all other cultures:

Cultural pillar3Due to Christian and Islamic expansionism, most of the world already follows the same culture, which is the Abrahamism. And the so-called “Middle Easterns” are in fact Westerns.

Judaism, Christianity and Islam are not completely different religions as many people think, they are just branches of the same religion. Who share several things in common as origin, creator god, creation myth, heaven and hell, deities etc. Classify Abrahamic religions as completely different makes as much sense as classify Lutheranism and Pentecostalism as different cultures.

Another more detailed but in my opinion contains some flaws is this, from the book The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography (Martin W Lewis)

6446273_orig

The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography (Martin W Lewis)

GEOGRAPHY

The most obvious distortions and the same time the least commented:

There is no separation between “Europa” and “Asia”, both form a single continent called Eurasia. So why they did this separation? For the article does not get too big, I will try to summarize why this is wrong.

The reasons they say are:

  • Historical reasons, the Herodotus map.
  • Cultural reasons(Christians vs. Non-Christians).
  • And an argument that “Europe” is a peninsula big enough to be called a continent.
  1. What Herodotus meant by Europe, Asia and Africa, was only sides of the Ecumene(the known world around the Mediterranean) separated by water. He never said that there was racial or cultural distinction between Europeans, Asians and Africans. The only distinction he made was with North-Europeans to whom they were described as barbarians and racially inferior. However, these terms were never used until the 18th century, when they saw the need to differentiate imperialist Christians from other peoples who would be colonized. Moreover, names of regions or directions exist by the thousands in all cultures, but all have been abandoned except this which by coincidence is compatible with the Christian-centric vision.
  2. Like I said, Christian-centric vision. As if non-Christian formed some kind of culture or ethnicity.
  3. Peninsula definition: an area of land almost completely surrounded by water except for an isthmus connecting it with the mainland.

    “Europe” is not considered peninsula by any serious geographer.  There are controversies about what defines a continent, but something that is practically consensus is: To be considered continent, its necessary to have its own tectonic plate and be separated by water for the most part. “Europe” does not meet any of these criteria.

But that does not explain everything. What is the real motivation behind these lies?

Simple, as you will see next, the current dominant race in “Europe” is a people with no history, no own civilization or culture. But at the same time they have an instinct of blind pride and dishonesty that makes them want to modify history to sustain that pride, reflected in their “supremacist” religion.

HISTORICALLY

We know that the world has changed a lot since ancient history, mainly because of Western imperialism(Christian and Muslim). Then how the world really was organized in ancient history? To answer this I created this simple map and table:

MACROCIVILIZATION 3

Table:

Cultural Sphere Race Subrace Cultural Pillar Cradle
1 Mediterranean Caucasoid Mediterranid Abrahamism Mesopotamia

and Nile river

2 Indosphere Australoid +

Austronesian

Diverse Dharmic religions Indus river
3 Sinosphere Mongoloid Sinid Confucianism Yellow river
4 Northwest Eurasia Caucasoid Mostly Teutonic and Alpinid Paganism Nomads
5 Northeast Eurasia Mongoloid Tungid Tengrism Nomads

As you can see, there is no such thing as “Eastern” or “Western civilization”, at least not as we use the word today.

No doubt the civilization that most changed and consequently was most distorted was the Mediterranean Civilization, and here is an important part of the history that no historian, whether right or left, will never tell you: AFTER THE INVASIONS OF THE BARBARIAN TRIBES, THE WHOLE MEDITERRANEAN WAS ALMOST COMPLETELY MODIFIED.

Let me explain. During the period known in the Mediterranean as Barbarian Invasions(In the North dishonestly called only as “Migration Period“). The Germanics not only migrated to the North of the Mediterranean(the “South Europe”), but also massacred and raped thousands of Mediterraneans. Then the northern Mediterranean was partially replaced by the “northern Europeans” and they became Germanized.

Not to mention the blue-eyed blond slaves who were captured mainly by the Greeks and Romans, who were later freed without deportation, happened to blacks in the Americas.

On the other side, the South and East of the Mediterranean were also invaded by nomadic tribes, but this time from the South, by the real Arabs. These original Arabs are neither Mediterranean(geographically speaking) nor Mediterranid(race) but Arabid:

Besides the miscegenation, both Germanic and Arab tribes imposed part of their customs on the original Mediterranean. This means that the Northern Mediterranean became Germanized, and the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean were Arabized.

However, the Mediterranean race still exists, and it is easier for a common “South European” to pass as a native in North Africa than in Scandinavia, and the “European culture(Christianity)” was invented in the “Asia”, more precisely in the Levant region(Eastern Mediterranean). So, despite these events, say that there is a European race or culture simply does not make sense.

About linguistics. For me and for several other race-realist this “science” is irrelevant for 3 reasons:

  • Is very well documented that it has been distorted several times to fit with racist ideologies. For example, when the Finns were poor, and suffered discrimination from their neighbors, Swedish racists tried to classify the Finnish language as being close to the Mongolian language, something that is a mockery to this day. And that’s a joke even today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscientific_language_comparison
  • Contradictions. Indians would be more “European” than the Hungarians, Basques, Welsh etc.
  • Meme. Language you learn and teach. Black Americans speak English, but they are not Anglo-Saxons.

The same about genetics. Many whites are classified as almost completely black, identical twin classified as of different races, and haplogroups of “europe” are found more often in non-“European” peoples(eg: Chadic are 40.6% R1b, Germans 23.3%. Kyrgyz(Turkic) are 63.5% R1a, while Russians are 48.3%). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y-DNA_haplogroups_by_ethnic_group
And the “Europeans” are still genetically different from each other so that criterion also cannot be used.

 

Now about Asia, where the distortion becomes more obvious:

According western ESBOCO3

 

 

Conclusion: The division Asia and Europe makes no sense whether in race, culture or geography. This division was created by Western barbarians without own civilization to steal part of the Mediterranean civilization. And the term “Asian” is a racist form of generalization.

 

Other maps for comparison:

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The Center of Civilization

What is the center of civilization? The chauvinist propaganda done by some dishonest people distorts our understanding of history, but analyzing it impartially with the help of a map, we realize is not exactly like they say:

center of civilization3

  • Although Andes and Mesoamerica also have their independent cradles of civilization, they are not on the map because they did not influence many other peoples. ¹
  • The East Mediterranean, where the first civilization emerged and was a very advanced place during much of history, never recovered after the Mongol invasion. ²
  • India also became a shithole after British domination, they had almost 25% of the world GDP in 1700, when they finally gained independence it dropped to 4%. ³
  • Instead of most of people think, the golden age of west is very recent. When they left the West in the 15th century was not only to buy spices or distribute enlightenment as many think. In fact, besides buying manufactured goods that they were not able to produce, they also wanted to LEARN technologies and philosophies of the East. Many of these technologies and especially the philosophies have been copied in a grotesque way, and the credits have not been attributed to the true authors. But still, it was only in the 19th century that the West actually overcome the East, after centuries of material and intellectual robbery in the whole world and stagnation of the East.   ⁶ 
  • Russia is not in the map because they do not have much economic or cultural influence out of Eurasia.
  • Japan is important technologically and culturally(for the weebs), but politically it is still an North American colony, their army is limited and their economy is stagnant for 30 years.
  • North America become important in the 20th century with the two world wars that destroyed all their rivals while they profited by selling supplies to both sides.

    Although the entire American continent has been colonized by Western Eurasia, it is now a multiethnic place, and this becomes more visible when you look at the higher classes in universities and high technology companies.¹º ¹¹ ¹² ¹³

  • China was one of the 6 cradles of civilization, and was also the most advanced civilization during most of history. Something recognized by many other civilizations, such as the Italian Marco Polo, who once said that there was no race on earth smarter than the Chinese, and even the British, who even paid tribute to China.
    In the 19th and 20th century it almost was destroyed due to the poor Manchu administration, which resulted in wars and later Communism. However, since the opening of the market made by the late 20th century, China has been growing very fast not only economically but also technologically, and the forecast is to surmount the entire West in a few decades. ¹⁴ ¹⁵ ¹⁶
    This makes China the only ancient civilization that remains powerful, no wonder its real name means Empire of the Center.

Some sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cradle_of_civilization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age#Decline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_regions_by_past_GDP_(PPP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_patents
http://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.asp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_leading_trade_partners
youtube.com/watch?v=8HZdVDTN_2Q
https://www.forbes.com/sites/schifrin/2015/12/20/diversity-at-top-colleges-heres-the-proof/#512c0fcf6d3f
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/diversity-in-tech/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_India#Beginning_of_European_explorations_and_establishment_of_Colonialism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States#20th_century
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tributaries_of_Imperial_China
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_past_and_projected_GDP_(PPP)#Long_term_GDP_estimates

Edit: Although most are outside the circle, ancient greece is included in the eastern Mediterranean in every sense (including racially)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Mediterranean

s8.imagestime.com/out.php/i879877_eastmediterranid.png